<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for WTT: [RP]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wttrp.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wttrp.com</link>
	<description>Casual players, hardcore RP</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 22:45:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Your Wrath Bucket List by The Obscurecast Ep 19: Pickle Tangent &#124; Obscurecast</title>
		<link>http://wttrp.com/2010/09/22/your-wrath-bucket-list/comment-page-1/#comment-58796</link>
		<dc:creator>The Obscurecast Ep 19: Pickle Tangent &#124; Obscurecast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 22:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wttrp.com/?p=1400#comment-58796</guid>
		<description>[...] Week&#8217;s Obscurity was inspired by The Bucket List on WTT:RP. We discuss what we&#8217;re still looking to complete before Cataclysm comes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Week&#8217;s Obscurity was inspired by The Bucket List on WTT:RP. We discuss what we&#8217;re still looking to complete before Cataclysm comes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lay the Groundwork Now by Laying the Groundwork</title>
		<link>http://wttrp.com/2011/11/05/lay-the-groundwork-now/comment-page-1/#comment-58490</link>
		<dc:creator>Laying the Groundwork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wttrp.com/?p=1729#comment-58490</guid>
		<description>[...] Bricu put up a post over at WTT:RP about getting ready for the upcoming expansion and how we and our characters can get ready for it. It&#8217;s a good idea to start thinking about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bricu put up a post over at WTT:RP about getting ready for the upcoming expansion and how we and our characters can get ready for it. It&#8217;s a good idea to start thinking about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Roles in RP by louhish</title>
		<link>http://wttrp.com/2011/11/12/roles-in-rp/comment-page-1/#comment-58285</link>
		<dc:creator>louhish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wttrp.com/2011/11/12/roles-in-rp/#comment-58285</guid>
		<description>Some of the best fun I&#039;ve had has been roleplaying fools - that is, a character with little or no common sense, rarely a hero or a villain. This character loves sticking her nose into all sorts of places it doesn&#039;t belong, rarely initiating a major plot-arc but adding lively side-plots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the best fun I&#8217;ve had has been roleplaying fools &#8211; that is, a character with little or no common sense, rarely a hero or a villain. This character loves sticking her nose into all sorts of places it doesn&#8217;t belong, rarely initiating a major plot-arc but adding lively side-plots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Romance: The First Rule by Kyraine</title>
		<link>http://wttrp.com/2011/11/15/romance-the-first-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-58149</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyraine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wttrp.com/?p=1756#comment-58149</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Rhoelyn, I tend to avoid IC romantic relationships as a rule.  I&#039;ve only messed with one once, and that ended almost before it got started when the other player left the game.  I&#039;ve had characters who are in relationships or are married (or divorced), but that&#039;s been with my own or another player&#039;s NPC.  

Rules, though.  I&#039;d say the biggest one is the same rule as any other type of character relationship, and the same one that was mentioned in the blog post.  Talk it out!  Especially if something you do has the potential to affect the other character.  It&#039;s just like being co-authors on a story.  While it might be my character, if what she&#039;s doing is going to affect someone else or the story as a whole, I want to have a word with the other player first.  

I think that rule is true for all character relations though, not just the romantic ones.  RP stories are shared, and that&#039;s something I try to remember all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Rhoelyn, I tend to avoid IC romantic relationships as a rule.  I&#8217;ve only messed with one once, and that ended almost before it got started when the other player left the game.  I&#8217;ve had characters who are in relationships or are married (or divorced), but that&#8217;s been with my own or another player&#8217;s NPC.  </p>
<p>Rules, though.  I&#8217;d say the biggest one is the same rule as any other type of character relationship, and the same one that was mentioned in the blog post.  Talk it out!  Especially if something you do has the potential to affect the other character.  It&#8217;s just like being co-authors on a story.  While it might be my character, if what she&#8217;s doing is going to affect someone else or the story as a whole, I want to have a word with the other player first.  </p>
<p>I think that rule is true for all character relations though, not just the romantic ones.  RP stories are shared, and that&#8217;s something I try to remember all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Recruiting by RP and Recruitment</title>
		<link>http://wttrp.com/2011/11/09/recruiting/comment-page-1/#comment-58057</link>
		<dc:creator>RP and Recruitment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wttrp.com/?p=1743#comment-58057</guid>
		<description>[...] a discussion over at WTT:RP going on about recruitment in RP, and how it differs from other guild [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a discussion over at WTT:RP going on about recruitment in RP, and how it differs from other guild [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Romance: The First Rule by Rhoelyn</title>
		<link>http://wttrp.com/2011/11/15/romance-the-first-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-58003</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhoelyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wttrp.com/?p=1756#comment-58003</guid>
		<description>I avoid in-character (romantic) relationships, for the most part. I&#039;ve dabbled with them in the past, and I just find them awkward and unconvincing. Perhaps it&#039;s just a lack of experience, but I think character romantic emotions become stupidly blurry too easily. I mean, just look at all the Hollywood romances that begin or end because of a screen romance role.

That&#039;s just me, though. More power to ya, IC romance players.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I avoid in-character (romantic) relationships, for the most part. I&#8217;ve dabbled with them in the past, and I just find them awkward and unconvincing. Perhaps it&#8217;s just a lack of experience, but I think character romantic emotions become stupidly blurry too easily. I mean, just look at all the Hollywood romances that begin or end because of a screen romance role.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just me, though. More power to ya, IC romance players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RP Date Night by Corise</title>
		<link>http://wttrp.com/2011/11/14/rp-date-night/comment-page-1/#comment-57976</link>
		<dc:creator>Corise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wttrp.com/2011/11/14/rp-date-night/#comment-57976</guid>
		<description>For some reason, the vast majority of my characters seem to end up in relationships, even the ones I set out to play as commitment-phobes or wallflowers. At last count, I had four characters who are married to other PCs, plus one whose romantic situation at any given moment can best be summed up by the immortal Facebook phrase &quot;it&#039;s complicated&quot; (*coughCorisecough*).

As far as dating goes... well. I&#039;ve definitely done a lot of RP centered around the developing relationships, and depending on how liberal your definition of &quot;date&quot; is, my characters do it quite frequently! Boomstick Pub Night has been a regular date night for several of my characters and their significant others (most notably Jenive/Imble and Corise/Tigerlily), and a lot of my characters have attended various RP social events as one half of a couple.

I&#039;ve also done lots of one-on-one RP with my characters and their partners (no, not THAT sort of one-on-one RP, get your mind out of the gutter)... quiet nights at home, picnics on the Tanaris beaches, trips to the Darkmoon Fair, snowball fights in Dun Morogh, wild rides through Nagrand on the back of a chopper, dips in the hot springs in Un&#039;Goro Crater, and many more. Jenive and Imble were probably my most adventurous couple in that regard; their relationship developed during Burning Crusade in part over the course of Imble escorting Jenive to places she was WAY too low-level to go alone.

Of course, quite a few of my characters have what you might call &quot;office romances,&quot; falling in love with folks they frequently adventure alongside... nothing like life or death situations to draw people closer together! So they&#039;ve had their share of &quot;working dates,&quot; as well, stealing intimate moments in between boss fights or taking a short break from questing to enjoy the beauty of the world they&#039;re fighting to save.

Then, of course, there&#039;s Corise. Whose idea of a fun date is getting wasted and starting a bar fight in the Grim Guzzler...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason, the vast majority of my characters seem to end up in relationships, even the ones I set out to play as commitment-phobes or wallflowers. At last count, I had four characters who are married to other PCs, plus one whose romantic situation at any given moment can best be summed up by the immortal Facebook phrase &#8220;it&#8217;s complicated&#8221; (*coughCorisecough*).</p>
<p>As far as dating goes&#8230; well. I&#8217;ve definitely done a lot of RP centered around the developing relationships, and depending on how liberal your definition of &#8220;date&#8221; is, my characters do it quite frequently! Boomstick Pub Night has been a regular date night for several of my characters and their significant others (most notably Jenive/Imble and Corise/Tigerlily), and a lot of my characters have attended various RP social events as one half of a couple.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also done lots of one-on-one RP with my characters and their partners (no, not THAT sort of one-on-one RP, get your mind out of the gutter)&#8230; quiet nights at home, picnics on the Tanaris beaches, trips to the Darkmoon Fair, snowball fights in Dun Morogh, wild rides through Nagrand on the back of a chopper, dips in the hot springs in Un&#8217;Goro Crater, and many more. Jenive and Imble were probably my most adventurous couple in that regard; their relationship developed during Burning Crusade in part over the course of Imble escorting Jenive to places she was WAY too low-level to go alone.</p>
<p>Of course, quite a few of my characters have what you might call &#8220;office romances,&#8221; falling in love with folks they frequently adventure alongside&#8230; nothing like life or death situations to draw people closer together! So they&#8217;ve had their share of &#8220;working dates,&#8221; as well, stealing intimate moments in between boss fights or taking a short break from questing to enjoy the beauty of the world they&#8217;re fighting to save.</p>
<p>Then, of course, there&#8217;s Corise. Whose idea of a fun date is getting wasted and starting a bar fight in the Grim Guzzler&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RP Date Night by Zusterke</title>
		<link>http://wttrp.com/2011/11/14/rp-date-night/comment-page-1/#comment-57957</link>
		<dc:creator>Zusterke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wttrp.com/2011/11/14/rp-date-night/#comment-57957</guid>
		<description>Well.. some of my characters ended up in romance, or dates. Personally, I ended up not being too fond of the date concept, though I found romance to be a addition to the roleplay. Maybe it&#039;s because I see RP too much like a book, where the story is key and love or romance are but ingredients to spice it up.
That is perhaps why I prefer platonic love, or &quot;understandings of deep respect&quot; for many of my characters. It permits one to stick to their character concept, their storylines and settings, while having &quot;a special someone&quot; around.

If we look at the Jaina and Arthas story in warcraft 3, for example, then we don&#039;t have a map where we need to set up the perfect date between them. They never have to break character. They can both remain their iconic personalities. And yet, there is no denying the touch of &quot;something special&quot; in the air when they meet again.
That is perhaps the style I prefer above all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well.. some of my characters ended up in romance, or dates. Personally, I ended up not being too fond of the date concept, though I found romance to be a addition to the roleplay. Maybe it&#8217;s because I see RP too much like a book, where the story is key and love or romance are but ingredients to spice it up.<br />
That is perhaps why I prefer platonic love, or &#8220;understandings of deep respect&#8221; for many of my characters. It permits one to stick to their character concept, their storylines and settings, while having &#8220;a special someone&#8221; around.</p>
<p>If we look at the Jaina and Arthas story in warcraft 3, for example, then we don&#8217;t have a map where we need to set up the perfect date between them. They never have to break character. They can both remain their iconic personalities. And yet, there is no denying the touch of &#8220;something special&#8221; in the air when they meet again.<br />
That is perhaps the style I prefer above all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Roles in RP by Zusterke</title>
		<link>http://wttrp.com/2011/11/12/roles-in-rp/comment-page-1/#comment-57956</link>
		<dc:creator>Zusterke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wttrp.com/2011/11/12/roles-in-rp/#comment-57956</guid>
		<description>When it comes to RP and RP settings, what I find often lacking is &quot;supportive&quot; roles. There are many players who want to be the king of the organisation, the big hero, the main character of the whole story or be, at least, a major contributor. People like to be at the center of things. 
When it comes to ... &quot;lesser&quot;.. roles, such as waiters, waitresses, courtesans or even simple down to earth clerics, I find people burn up on the role rather quickly. I, myself, struggle with it as well.

The conflict, I think, arrises from the lack of freedom in &quot;personal initiative&quot;... or its conflict with the dependency on others. If I roll a butler, then I might be having a blast playing that person to a smug noble. But when that noble didn&#039;t log on.. Then what do I do?
I could initiate my own RP then. For example the butler could visit the city to buy things for his Lord, or simply enjoy the end of his shift in a bar. BUT, if that leads to a new plot evolving around the butler that doesn&#039;t include the Lord, then you obtain a conflict. Either the character becomes its own &#039;main story character&#039;, and the role of being a butler is diluted. Or you stick to the supportive role, and see lovely RP pass by.
It&#039;s almost the same tragic story you see in Spin-Offs where the sideshow character doesn&#039;t cut it to be a main character without altering the character severely.

My main character is a Light cleric. I was hoping to make a shy, frightened little scribe who pales and faints at the first sight of trouble. I&#039;m often amused by such &quot;supporting roles&quot; in movies and books, and felt like RP&#039;ing one myself. 
I daresay it&#039;s the only character in its genre I managed to call a success. There was a problem: such a character would avoid all kinds of trouble.. but without trouble, he can&#039;t play the frightened sideshow. He needed to be placed in adventures that are &quot;unnatural&quot; to him.
The solution was simple, for this one: placing him in a Light order. But it also created an incredible dependency between my character and the guild. Without the guild, he looses a large part of &quot;how he is RP&#039;d&quot;.

Luckily, the scribe and priest concept proved flexible enough to work on something outside the guild. I started adding to his work by working on sermons, rituals and prayers.
I have written small IC books in his name.
I soon learned this was a niche that was lacking in our community. We had many people wanting a marriage or funeral, wanting a prayer session, and even a handful playing priests. But very few people actually took pleasure in writing out detailed works for it.
After about 2 funerals, I had acquired a bit of a reputation in this niche and found myself requested for such events on a regular basis. 
Regular enough to make the combination with my guild duties a constant source of RP.

I tried other supportive roles: waiters, courtesans, witch (in service of a noble). But each of them struggled with balancing &quot;their own story&quot; with &quot;their supportive role&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to RP and RP settings, what I find often lacking is &#8220;supportive&#8221; roles. There are many players who want to be the king of the organisation, the big hero, the main character of the whole story or be, at least, a major contributor. People like to be at the center of things.<br />
When it comes to &#8230; &#8220;lesser&#8221;.. roles, such as waiters, waitresses, courtesans or even simple down to earth clerics, I find people burn up on the role rather quickly. I, myself, struggle with it as well.</p>
<p>The conflict, I think, arrises from the lack of freedom in &#8220;personal initiative&#8221;&#8230; or its conflict with the dependency on others. If I roll a butler, then I might be having a blast playing that person to a smug noble. But when that noble didn&#8217;t log on.. Then what do I do?<br />
I could initiate my own RP then. For example the butler could visit the city to buy things for his Lord, or simply enjoy the end of his shift in a bar. BUT, if that leads to a new plot evolving around the butler that doesn&#8217;t include the Lord, then you obtain a conflict. Either the character becomes its own &#8216;main story character&#8217;, and the role of being a butler is diluted. Or you stick to the supportive role, and see lovely RP pass by.<br />
It&#8217;s almost the same tragic story you see in Spin-Offs where the sideshow character doesn&#8217;t cut it to be a main character without altering the character severely.</p>
<p>My main character is a Light cleric. I was hoping to make a shy, frightened little scribe who pales and faints at the first sight of trouble. I&#8217;m often amused by such &#8220;supporting roles&#8221; in movies and books, and felt like RP&#8217;ing one myself.<br />
I daresay it&#8217;s the only character in its genre I managed to call a success. There was a problem: such a character would avoid all kinds of trouble.. but without trouble, he can&#8217;t play the frightened sideshow. He needed to be placed in adventures that are &#8220;unnatural&#8221; to him.<br />
The solution was simple, for this one: placing him in a Light order. But it also created an incredible dependency between my character and the guild. Without the guild, he looses a large part of &#8220;how he is RP&#8217;d&#8221;.</p>
<p>Luckily, the scribe and priest concept proved flexible enough to work on something outside the guild. I started adding to his work by working on sermons, rituals and prayers.<br />
I have written small IC books in his name.<br />
I soon learned this was a niche that was lacking in our community. We had many people wanting a marriage or funeral, wanting a prayer session, and even a handful playing priests. But very few people actually took pleasure in writing out detailed works for it.<br />
After about 2 funerals, I had acquired a bit of a reputation in this niche and found myself requested for such events on a regular basis.<br />
Regular enough to make the combination with my guild duties a constant source of RP.</p>
<p>I tried other supportive roles: waiters, courtesans, witch (in service of a noble). But each of them struggled with balancing &#8220;their own story&#8221; with &#8220;their supportive role&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RP Date Night by Shad</title>
		<link>http://wttrp.com/2011/11/14/rp-date-night/comment-page-1/#comment-57942</link>
		<dc:creator>Shad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wttrp.com/2011/11/14/rp-date-night/#comment-57942</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had two characters have romances, though one didn&#039;t (doesn&#039;t) exactly have dates so much as arguments.  The other definitely had dates, and I RPed a bunch of those ingame.  Date spots are what you make them, really--find a quiet place to wander and chat, what more could you ask for from a date?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had two characters have romances, though one didn&#8217;t (doesn&#8217;t) exactly have dates so much as arguments.  The other definitely had dates, and I RPed a bunch of those ingame.  Date spots are what you make them, really&#8211;find a quiet place to wander and chat, what more could you ask for from a date?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

